Showing posts with label middle class. Show all posts
Showing posts with label middle class. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

No Help for Middle class Americans. Can we get help sooner than later?.


After a year of failed efforts, Congress and the new administration are considering more aggressive measures, including a possible change to bankruptcy law. Homeowner relief could come as part of a new economic stimulus plan, a revised financial system bailout program or as a standalone measure.

So far, progress remains painfully slow. More than 3 million homes have been lost to foreclosure since the housing bubble burst. Roughly one in 10 homeowners with mortgages are either in foreclosure or more than 30 days late in payments — the highest delinquency rate on record.

Without more aggressive measures, another 8 million to 10 million foreclosures are forecast over the next four years, according to Credit Suisse. That amounts to roughly one in six households with a mortgage

It is simply mind-boggling to me that (Congress and the White House) have moved so slowly to address this issue,” said John Taylor, president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, which has been lobbying for foreclosure relief.

Congress and the incoming administration are taking a multipronged approach to foreclosure relief.

"Accelerating foreclosures is obviously, in my view, the huge driving problem right now,” said Elizabeth Warren, a Harvard law professor appointed by Congress to chair a panel overseeing the financial bailout. "Until we think in a more comprehensive way, we can't create solutions that will really make a difference," she told Congress last month.

Many of solutions tried so far have been stymied by the legal morass created by the modern mortgage.

In past recessions, it was not uncommon for lenders to work out more affordable terms with borrowers who had fallen on hard times. Bankers often prefer to cut their losses by lowering monthly payments and stretching them out over a longer term rather than bearing the cost of foreclosure. But the complex system of financing the recent housing boom — which was based heavily on the pooling of mortgages that were then sold to thousands of investors — has hopelessly complicated a once fairly simple renegotiation between lender and homeowner.

Multiple classes of investors, each with different claims on the same mortgage, often have conflicting interests. Some will do better with a loan foreclosure while others would profit by keeping the loan performing. Some contracts setting up these pool pay loan “servicers” — the companies that manage mortgage payments to investors — more generous payments for loans in foreclosure and offer little financial incentive to undertake the more costly process of modifying terms.

You have got to have the investor or their representatives come to the table motivated to do something,” said Taylor. “And that’s currently what we don’t have.”
To break the logjam, Congress is considering various proposals, including both "carrots" and "sticks."

One of the "carrots" is included in a proposed revision to the $700 billion bailout of the financial industry known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP

Foreclosure Proposals:

Brankuptcy Law:

A deal between key Democrats and Citigroup opens the door for a measure first introduced a year ago that would allow bankruptcy judges to modify the terms of first mortgages on primary residences -- the only debt excluded from the bankruptcy process.
Under the latest proposal, borrowers must contact the mortgage lender 10 days prior to filing Chapter 13 to give the parties time to work out a modification. If no offer is made by the lender, the homeowner could file Chapter 13 and the judge could then treat as unsecured debt any amount of the mortgage that exceeds the newly appraised value of the home. The judge also could reduce the interest rate and extend the maturity of the loan.

This so-called "cramdown" provision is strenuously opposed by the lending industry, which argues that the risk that a loan will later be modified will increase the cost of borrowing.

FDIC PROGRAM:

Using Troubled Assets Relief Plan funds, the Treasury would pay mortgage servicers $1,000 for every modification they make under the program. Modifications must bring a borrower’s mortgage debt-to-income ratio to 31 percent.
Mortgage servicers start by reducing interest rates before extending the maturity to up to 40 years. If those steps do not work, the servicer defers principal. That means the borrower does not pay interest on part of the loan, though he must repay the full balance when he sells or refinances the house.

Hope Program:


Approved last summer under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, the Hope for Homeowners program has $300 billion available to refinance troubled borrowers into FHA mortgages. Legislative restrictions on the program have made it largely ineffective.
Congress is expected to eliminate many of these restrictions as part of the TARP revision, which means lenders will absorb a smaller loss if they refinance a troubled borrower into an FHA mortgage.

GSE/FHA Loan Program:

The maximum limit for Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and FHA loans dropped to $625,500 on Jan. 1. Many Democrats, including House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, support restoring the maximum loan size to the prior limit of $729,750.
This would help lower interest rates on these mortgages. FHA is becoming the program of choice for first-time buyers. Higher limits also put more homes in higher cost coastal cities into play for FHA.

Tax Incentives:

Spurred by the homebuilding industry, Democrats are working on tax strategies to help with the housing crisis. These include a tax credit available to all homebuyers, not just first-timers, of $7,500 -- and perhaps more.
The mortgage interest deduction may be extended to taxpayers who don't itemize. Tax incentives may also be provided to owners who rent out vacant properties.

Lower Mortgage Rates:

So far, the Federal Reserve has led the move to lower longer-term interest rates after targeting short-term rates as low as zero percent. Congress is looking at additional efforts to push mortgage rates as low as 2.99 percent.
These measures could include providing an explicit government guarantee on mortgages issued by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and federal home loan banks.

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

Why you should bail out Corporate CEO'S of America?


Why Government shouldn't bail out Corporate America and make some Corporate CEO's, CFO's accountable for their own mess. The Economy is in turmoil putting taxpayers on fears and speculations of the near future but the CEO's, CFO's living the High style with the outrageous and mega salaries.



This is the list of a few Corporate America CEO's, CFO's and their Mega Salaries.

Stanley O'Neal, Merrill Lynch

Following an $8.4 billion write-down at Merrill Lynch, the news that the head of the firm, Stanley O’Neal, would be leaving in late 2007 with more than $160 million in stock options and retirement perks in his pocket outraged many, from shareholders to legislators.
The previous year, O’Neal had been paid $46.4 million, making him the nation's second-highest paid executive in the country behind Lloyd C. Blankfein, the CEO of Goldman Sachs who made $54.3 million.

O’Neal was part of a group of corporate top dogs called to testify before Congress about excessive CEO pay. Merrill Lynch has since been taken over by Bank of America.

Angelo R. Mozilo, Countrywide Financial.

Angelo Mozilo built Countrywide Financial into the nation’s largest mortgage company and was paid handsomely during the real estate boom.

He fought against his own board’s attempts to cut back his pay by hiring a special consultant when things started going south in 2006.

His efforts paid off. In 2007, he took home $121.5 million from exercising stock options and compensation of over $22 million. This huge pay came in a year when the bottom dropped out of the housing market and Countrywide took a beating with a loss of $704 million and a nearly 80 percent skid in the company’s stock price.

The company was bought by Bank of America in July.

Richard Fuld, Lehman Bros.

In a New York Times opinion piece last month, Nicholas Kristof estimated that Lehman CEO Richard Fuld last year earned “roughly $17,000 an hour to obliterate a firm.”
That estimate was based on Fuld’s earnings in 2007 of more than $40 million
.

Lehman Bros., the oldest of the Wall Street titans founded in 1850, filed for bankruptcy last month.

Fuld, who has been CEO of Lehman since 1993, was faulted by analysts for not taking acting quickly enough to deal with the firm's problems

James Cayne, Bear Stearns

Bear Stearns CEO James Cayne made more than $160 million before the company hit the skids and was sold off at a discount price to JPMorgan Chase as part of a government bailout earlier this year.

At one point Cayne was worth about $1 billion on paper, but when the Wall Street firm crumbled he sold his stake for a mere $61 million.

Cayne, known for being an obsessive bridge player, was supposedly at a bridge tournament and unable to be reached when two major hedge funds at the firm collapsed in 2007, the beginning of the end for the firm.

Richard Syron, Freddie Mac

Despite not heeding warnings from his own staff that the risky loans Freddie Mac had financed could hit the company hard, Richard Syron was expected to walk away with a pay package of more than $14 million.

Freddie Mac, a government-sponsored enterprise that operated as a private company, was wholly taken over by federal regulators last month and Syron was officially out of a job on Sept. 6. The government said it would not pay Syron the golden parachute he expected to receive as part of his pay package, but it’s still unclear how much he’ll end up pocketing.

Syron, an economist, joined Freddie Mac in 2003 after it was revealed the company had manipulated earnings to the tune of $5 billion

Daniel Mudd, Fannie Mae

It’s hard to imagine the chief executive of a company established by Congress to help citizens buy homes would end up getting a raise when the firm was losing money and the housing market was collapsing.

But that’s just what happened to Daniel Mudd at Fannie Mae, who saw his pay rise 7 percent in 2007 to more than $13 million.

Mudd’s promised golden parachute, worth nearly $10 million, is in question because federal regulators have said they will not pay. It is unclear how much he will get.

Kennedy Thompson, Wachovia

Wachovia former chairman and CEO Kennedy Thompson received $21 million in 2007.

Thompson, 58, joined Wachovia in 1976 and had been at its helm for the past eight years before being ousted in June. He will receive a severance package worth $8.7 million.

He’s succeeded by Robert Steel, who was expected to get a $1 million salary with an opportunity for a $12 million bonus.

It’s unclear what Steel will receive now given Citigroup’s decision to buy Wachovia’s banking operations this week in a deal brokered by federal regulators.


Kerry Killinger, Washington Mutual

Washington Mutual’s longtime CEO Kerry Killinger was let go early last month as the company's share price fell in what turned out to be a death spiral.

Killinger received compensation valued at $14.4 million in 2007.

Killinger was replaced by Alan Fishman, but now that JPMorgan Chase has stepped in to buy WaMu’s banking assets, there is a chance Fishman could walk away with more than $19 million in salary and severance after only a few weeks at the helm.

To be fair, Fishman wasn't the one that took WaMu down a path lined with toxic mortgages and other bad assets. No, that role belonged to former CEO Kerry Killinger, who received $54 million over five years before leaving earlier this month. He's eligible for around $20 million in severance pay.

Martin Sullivan, AIG

A few months before the government announced it would be taking over American International Group in mid-September, the insurer’s chief executive, Martin Sullivan, was ousted. His parting gift was a severance package worth nearly $50 million.

In 2007, Sullivan received compensation of about $14 million.

Sullivan left the firm after AIG wrote down $20 billion in losses because of the company’s exposure to subprime mortgages.

In a rare twist, Sullivan’s temporary successor Robert Willumstad took a pass on the $22 million he was promised in his contract.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Could you Imagine your Grandchildrens paid their share for $ 700 billions?



My Son ask me why 700 billions? there is a lot of money. he said. I said yes,There is a lot money. Could you Imagine that Money on your shoulders? He said no way is too heavy.
Well, We as Taxpayers, our Kids, Grandchildrens are going to paid for this mess. So we must take action against those predators who make profit against the will of the taxpayers, consumers (Legal and Undocumented), Citizens and Non Citizens.
The goverment can help and bail out corrupted corporations but not hard workers citizens and non Citizens who's loosing their houses, their Family dreams, their hopes and the hard work earning value.
As a Goverment are we follow the Constitution: We the People or We the Corporate America? Who's to be blame and accountable for this mess?